[racket-dev] `letrec' and continuations

On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu> wrote:
> At Fri, 20 May 2011 10:55:36 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:
>> Can we really change the semantics of letrec in such a fundamental way?
>
> Sure. :)  But it's easier to not change `letrec', of course.
>
>

:)

Sorry; I meant: "if we make this change will we be able to release a
working system in the next N years or will it take that long to iron
out the bugs (and so we'll release only mostly working systems for
those next N years)."

Robby