| From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu) Date: Fri May 20 12:39:42 EDT 2011 |
|
At Fri, 20 May 2011 10:55:36 -0500, Robby Findler wrote: > Can we really change the semantics of letrec in such a fundamental way? Sure. :) But it's easier to not change `letrec', of course.
| Posted on the dev mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}