[racket-dev] Fancy application/automatic anonymous functions

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Matthias Felleisen
<matthias at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> For a while I decided to try point-free programming. You can do it in
> Racket as well as in Haskell. Then I ran across someone's rules for
> writing Scheme and he had written
>
>  (lambda (n) (+ x n))
>
> is just as readable if not more than
>
>  (curry + x)
>
> and often (not here) it is shorter. I tested it in my project and he's
> right.

+1 to this choice!

Robby