[racket-dev] racket vs. scheme vs. clojure (as it appears to others)

Right now, we're already using JS to decide which of the 3 initial
code snippets to display.  So, why not start with using Noel's tool
for that, and go from there?  We already have a built-in group of
possibilities to measure, and we're already using JavaScript.

As an aside, I suspect that non-JavaScript-browsers are more popular
among people who complain to Eli than than among the general visitor
population.  :)

On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Noel Welsh <noelwelsh at gmail.com> wrote:
> You have to contact the Myna server somehow to get suggestions. You
> can do this via the server or via the client, with the usual
> tradeoffs. I would go with the JS client as it's much faster to set
> up, and code the HTML in such a way that it still works if JS is
> disabled. (This is straightforward, and the example in the API docs
> does this.)
>
> N.
>
> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
>> Do you mean that it requires JS to work?  What about non-JS browsers?
>> (There are some people who find it important -- I've even made some
>> changes to the front page to make it friendlier to text browsers.)
>
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
>



-- 
sam th
samth at ccs.neu.edu