[racket-dev] racket/stream

On Mar 17, 2011, at 4:52 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:

> At Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:48:45 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>> 
>> On Mar 17, 2011, at 4:46 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I disagree only because of the lazy nature of stream __construction__, 
>>>> the potential confusion for first-timers, and the potential confusion with
>>>> some srfi or other. 
>>> 
>>> Can you provide an example that would create confusion?
>> 
>> 
>> See recent post and discussion on the user group. 
> 
> I see only confused related to `stream-cons' not being lazy, while I'm
> proposing that `stream-cons' exactly the usual lazy form. Am I missing
> something else


OUCH. I missed the '1' in your reply. Sorry, I am fine.