[racket-dev] exact nonnegative integers as sequences?

re-search [!!== hack]


On Apr 18, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:

> I don't know what that means...
> 
> (FWIW, I don't think that it works to come up with a way of
> translating values back and forth since the overhead would make it
> much less useful.)
> 
> 
> 20 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
>> I dunno. Do some search again-ing?
>> 
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
>>> 50 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
>>>>> As for Scratchit (obviously the right spelling), it does sound
>>>>> like a good idea, but the nice thing about the untyped -> TR route
>>>>> is that you get to keep your code, whereas a Scratchit thing would
>>>>> be useless if you can't use the libraries.
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, that would be in the plan.
>>> 
>>> How would you do that?
> 
> -- 
>          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
>                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev