[racket-dev] exact nonnegative integers as sequences?

I don't know what that means...

(FWIW, I don't think that it works to come up with a way of
translating values back and forth since the overhead would make it
much less useful.)


20 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
> I dunno. Do some search again-ing?
> 
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
> > 50 minutes ago, Robby Findler wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
> >> > As for Scratchit (obviously the right spelling), it does sound
> >> > like a good idea, but the nice thing about the untyped -> TR route
> >> > is that you get to keep your code, whereas a Scratchit thing would
> >> > be useless if you can't use the libraries.
> >>
> >> Yes, that would be in the plan.
> >
> > How would you do that?

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!