[racket-dev] [plt] Push #21341: master branch updated

I like the change, but I object to late changes in releases. The build
script may be an okay exception. My net opinion is no opinion.

Jay

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
> Does anyone have a preference or an objection to use this change in
> the release?
>
> * The important bit here is the sh installers for unix -- they're
>  currently using `plt' and `mz'.  (There were some complaints about
>  this.)
>
> * It's easy to verify -- just run the generated installers.  (And look
>  inside the source tgz/zip files.)  Even if there are problems,
>  fixing them is just repackaging the installers, keeping the same
>  contents.
>
> (Clarification: I don't have an opinion.)
>
>
> A few seconds ago, eli at racket-lang.org wrote:
>>
>> 2cda694 Eli Barzilay <eli at racket-lang.org> 2010-10-26 07:10
>> :
>> | Fix the names used by the `sh', `tgz', and `zip' installers to use
>> | `racket', `racket-textual' and `racket-full' instead of `plt', `mz', and
>> | `full'.
>> |
>> | (Also use uniform argument names in packaging functions.)
>> :
>>   M collects/meta/build/build |  108 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>
> --
>          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
>                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
>



-- 
Jay McCarthy <jay at cs.byu.edu>
Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University
http://teammccarthy.org/jay

"The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93