From: Carl Eastlund (cce at ccs.neu.edu) Date: Mon Feb 22 20:39:54 EST 2010 |
|
I appreciate the addition of sets to PLT datatypes, but the implementation just added to the trunk is very specific to immutable, hash table-based sets. In the spirit of scheme/dict, which allows for a variety of more interesting dictionary representations, can we leave scheme/set open to other representations of sets? Carl Eastlund
Posted on the dev mailing list. |
|