[racket-dev] (round), etc. in Typed Racket

From: Noel Welsh (noelwelsh at gmail.com)
Date: Mon Dec 13 08:44:20 EST 2010

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Robby Findler
<robby at eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
> Also,
> after having that look, I definitely think that if we got to do this
> one over that integer? accepting only exacts is wise; it seems too
> easy to allow inexacts to flow around when you didn't mean to with the
> current definition of the predicates.

I'm in agreement with this.


Posted on the dev mailing list.