[racket-dev] futures waiting for scheme_make_envunbox

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu> wrote:
> While we look into the other problems...
>
> What happens if you use `let' instead of the internal defines in
> `mandelbrot-point'?

That does indeed fix the problem. I'm surprised, though, since the TR
optimizer is just changing safe to unsafe operations here.  Some
aspect of that must be confusing the bytecode compiler.

Thanks for the quick diagnosis.
-- 
sam th
samth at ccs.neu.edu