[racket] Help re-writing a function recursively

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:07 AM, Peter Breitsprecher
<pkbreits at lakeheadu.ca>wrote:

>
> I knew that it was the result of the internal function call, but that it
> would have been the value of that variable that is passed to it.  and the
> other list so far would have been the stacked value  of list so far before
> the internal function call.  However I still thought it should have worked
> logically.
>

>> I just wanted to return the value of list-so-far at that point, and I
> assumed that was the way to do it.  Putting the reverse in still give me the
> same errors
>

Since you might have changed the code again it's probably easier to see
what's going on now if you show the latest code.

Cheers,
yc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20101117/e38a283d/attachment.html>