<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:07 AM, Peter Breitsprecher <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pkbreits@lakeheadu.ca">pkbreits@lakeheadu.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br><div class="gmail_quote"><div>I knew that it was the result of the internal function call, but that it would have been the value of that variable that is passed to it.� and the other list so far would have been the stacked value� of list so far before the internal function call.� However I still thought it should have worked logically.��</div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex">
<div class="gmail_quote"><div><div><br></div></div></div></blockquote></div><div>I just wanted to return the value of list-so-far at that point, and I assumed that was the way to do it.� Putting the reverse in still give me the same errors<br>
</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Since you might have changed the code again it's probably easier to see what's going on now if you show the latest code.�</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>yc</div>
<div><br></div></div>