[racket] status of keyword argument support in TR?

From: Sam Tobin-Hochstadt (samth at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Wed Dec 29 01:20:52 EST 2010

On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Neil Van Dyke <neil at neilvandyke.org> wrote:
> If you guys know now what the TR ":" syntax will look like for the usual
> keyword arguments, I would like to know what it is.

First, if you have a preference, I'll be happy to consider it.

My current idea is:

(A B #:foo C -> D)
(A [B #:foo C] ->* D)

for mandatory and optional, respectively.

sam th
samth at ccs.neu.edu

Posted on the users mailing list.