[plt-scheme] Re: Should PLT Scheme have two R6RS namespaces?

From: detmammut at googlemail.com (detmammut at googlemail.com)
Date: Mon Mar 23 12:11:49 EDT 2009

I had a discussion with eli on this allready in IRC. The problem is
not so much that these R6RS replacements are not available*, but that
someone has to step up to provide test-cases and support. I'll have a
week or two a free time starting april so I will port (the testcases
for) srfi-1 (unless someone else is faster :)

* see https://code.launchpad.net/~ikarus-libraries-team/ikarus-libraries/srfi

On 23 Mrz., 16:12, Matthew Flatt <mfl... at cs.utah.edu> wrote:
> At Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:04:59 -0500, Grant Rettke wrote:
> > Could we have a convention for, when using the SRFIs, that the
> > PLT'ized version have a regular number and R6RS specific versions have
> > the colon-prefixed number?
> Yes. I believe we've agreed on this convention, and we're just waiting
> on some mutable-list replacements for the colon-prefixed (i.e.,
> "%3a"-prefixed) files/directories in the "srfi" collection.
> _________________________________________________
>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme

Posted on the users mailing list.