[plt-scheme] Should PLT Scheme have two R6RS namespaces?

From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu)
Date: Mon Mar 23 11:12:11 EDT 2009

At Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:04:59 -0500, Grant Rettke wrote:
> Could we have a convention for, when using the SRFIs, that the
> PLT'ized version have a regular number and R6RS specific versions have
> the colon-prefixed number?

Yes. I believe we've agreed on this convention, and we're just waiting
on some mutable-list replacements for the colon-prefixed (i.e.,
"%3a"-prefixed) files/directories in the "srfi" collection.

Posted on the users mailing list.