[plt-scheme] plai: lazyness and exercise 6.4.2

From: emre berat nebioğlu (beratn at gmail.com)
Date: Wed Aug 26 11:19:53 EDT 2009

May be i am wrong. But i read this discussion and i plan to finish PLAI
book. I am in chapter 12.I supposed the different between eager and lazy
regime is in application of interp function.

I mean for eager regime we make two recursive call.

(interp blah
 blah blah
 (interp blah....

for lazy regime, we make one recursive call
(interp blah
 blah blah
am i true ?

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Aleix Conchillo Flaqué <
aconchillo at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 14:24, Thomas Holubar<holubar at phirho.com> wrote:
> > Hi Aleix!
> >
> > Why needs the second argument to be a FAE?
> > Couldn't it be a FAE-Value? That one is "closure compatible"...
> >
> Yes, thanks Thomas. As I said in the other mail, that was the problem.
> Everything makes sense now.
> Aleix
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20090826/f644aacc/attachment.html>

Posted on the users mailing list.