| From: Aleix Conchillo Flaqué (aconchillo at gmail.com) Date: Wed Aug 26 10:30:46 EDT 2009 |
|
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 14:24, Thomas Holubar<holubar at phirho.com> wrote: > Hi Aleix! > > Why needs the second argument to be a FAE? > Couldn't it be a FAE-Value? That one is "closure compatible"... > Yes, thanks Thomas. As I said in the other mail, that was the problem. Everything makes sense now. Aleix
| Posted on the users mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}