[plt-scheme] plai: lazyness and exercise 6.4.2

From: Aleix Conchillo Flaqué (aconchillo at gmail.com)
Date: Wed Aug 26 10:30:46 EDT 2009

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 14:24, Thomas Holubar<holubar at phirho.com> wrote:
> Hi Aleix!
> Why needs the second argument to be a FAE?
> Couldn't it be a FAE-Value? That one is "closure compatible"...

Yes, thanks Thomas. As I said in the other mail, that was the problem.
Everything makes sense now.


Posted on the users mailing list.