[plt-scheme] Re: Is R6RS useless for PLT?

From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Tue Nov 18 12:41:52 EST 2008

On Nov 18, 2008, at 12:18 PM, Ernie Smith wrote:

> Simply sticking to RnRs merely makes PLT extensions esoteric.
> In the event that PLT scheme is no more, what is my emigration  
> strategy
> for my body  of work?  What can I do now to minimize that problem  
> without also ruling out all the extended features?
> I think that is more the spirit of his question.
> I'm interested in that answer myself.

Please read my reply. I address this point specifically
and we are actively working on a strategy. -- Matthias

Posted on the users mailing list.