[plt-scheme] SRFI 41

From: Jos Koot (jos.koot at telefonica.net)
Date: Wed Feb 6 15:06:54 EST 2008

Hi Eli,
Good point. Agreed.
I think srfi 45 as now implemented in PLT is about as fast as my version.
For the moment I'll import the current PLT version of srfi 45 (if I recall correctly it is already provided by #lang scheme and I don't even have to import it)
I trust that the problem you and I refer to will be fixed in due time (: last time I looked at the problem report as sent by Phil, it was not yet closed (: dont take that as a criticism, I know there are more things to do ::))
Thanks to Chongkai and you and all of PLT for the opportunity to contribute. I like that.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Eli Barzilay" <eli at barzilay.org>
To: "Jos Koot" <jos.koot at telefonica.net>
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 8:22 PM
Subject: Re: [plt-scheme] SRFI 41

> BTW, if you get to do that, it would be good to avoid duplicated code
> as much as possible.  The main thing that I'm thinking of is the
> promise implementation -- IIRC, Phil carries his own version of srfi
> 45, which is not needed in PLT v4, since that became the
> implementation for all core promises.
> (Modulo the problem that IIRC you pointed at not too long ago -- but
> even with that, it's better to invest resources in fixing and using
> the core package then duplicate it.)
> -- 
>          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
>                  http://www.barzilay.org/                 Maze is Life!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20080206/a4eda48f/attachment.html>

Posted on the users mailing list.