[plt-scheme] Are new Schemers supposed to be reading SRFIs?

From: Robby Findler (robby at cs.uchicago.edu)
Date: Thu May 10 17:31:00 EDT 2007

If the srfi authors had given them all short names, it might eliminate
those concerns -- the number is authoritative, but the name just helps
remember it.

Maybe base the names on the titles of the srfis?


On 5/10/07, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
> On May 10, Chongkai Zhu wrote:
> > I'm planning to add a "list.ss" file under "collection/srfi", which
> > will be the same as "1.ss" except the module name. But here I would
> > also like to hear other people's opinion on how to do this.
> I don't think that this is a good idea.  There are already several
> srfis that would have similar names, srfis with names that are close
> to plt libraries, and there is no convention for alternative names for
> srfis which would make things worse if names are added later and
> they're not the names that you choose.
> --
>           ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
>                   http://www.barzilay.org/                 Maze is Life!
> _________________________________________________
>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme

Posted on the users mailing list.