[plt-scheme] Vector / matrix benchmarks -- CORRECTION

From: Williams, M. Douglas (M.DOUGLAS.WILLIAMS at saic.com)
Date: Thu Sep 7 16:20:44 EDT 2006

Shouldn't you decrease the size of the matrices so that Scheme also runs in
0ms?  Then Scheme is as fast as C.  QED


> -----Original Message-----
> From: plt-scheme-bounces at list.cs.brown.edu [mailto:plt-scheme-
> bounces at list.cs.brown.edu] On Behalf Of Noel Welsh
> Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 8:50 AM
> To: plt-scheme
> Subject: [plt-scheme] Vector / matrix benchmarks -- CORRECTION
> In the previous benchmarks I posted I was using the FFI in
> an inefficient manner.  I've changed the code, and the C
> benchmarks now run in the expected 0ms.  So C code is
> infinitely faster than Scheme code :(
> Yes, I should increase the size of the matrices to get more
> meaningful comparisons.  It isn't worth the bother for my
> needs ATM, but I'll so if enough people are interested.
> N.
> Email: noelwelsh <at> yahoo <dot> com   noel <at> untyped <dot> com
> AIM: noelhwelsh
> Blogs: http://monospaced.blogspot.com/  http://www.untyped.com/untyping/
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _________________________________________________
>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme

Posted on the users mailing list.