[plt-scheme] package management thoughts

On Mar 11, Paul Steckler wrote:
> > I think that PLTNET sounds much better...
> 
> How about PLaneT?

I N+1 the motion, with some comments:

1. It needs some acronyms (some "PLT Archive Network" thing).  Or not.

2. What it does is a more important issue.

3. I think that the only way is some simplistic version-based thing
   like the dot net or the xemacs things.

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                  http://www.barzilay.org/                 Maze is Life!