[plt-scheme] package management thoughts

From: Harri Haataja (harri.haataja at kolumbus.fi)
Date: Tue Mar 25 07:05:08 EST 2003

On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 09:10:54PM -0500, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> On Mar 11, Paul Steckler wrote:
> > > I think that PLTNET sounds much better...
> > How about PLaneT?
> I N+1 the motion, with some comments:
> 1. It needs some acronyms (some "PLT Archive Network" thing).  Or not.

Plt Lovers Archive NETwork 

That does wreck the caps in PLT unless you use an alternative form of
highlighting or smallcaps or such to make letters in three different..

There's no other P to use for a recursion nor an S for scheme, sadly.

Posted on the users mailing list.