[racket-dev] Refactoring in-vector and friends

From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu)
Date: Fri Dec 3 08:20:34 EST 2010

Is it possible that your binary didn't get rebuilt? The test failure
and crash seem to be in recently added tests to go with recent repairs
to the Racket binary.

At Fri, 3 Dec 2010 13:15:24 +0000, Noel Welsh wrote:
> Since merging with HEAD I get repeatable segfaults in the prompt tests:
> ...
> and 19526 exception field tests.
> Errors were:
> (Section (got expected (call)))
> ((syntax) (9 10 (#<procedure:dynamic-require> (quote set-local-dfs) ten)))
> (Other messages report successful tests of error-handling behavior.)
> Section(prompt)
> Seg fault (internal error) at 0x1c0
> Bus error
> These errors didn't appear with my changes before merging. I went back
> to the revision before my commit and I still get this segfault. I've
> rebuilt (raco setup) numerous times. Is this a known problem? If it
> is, I can push the rest of my changes. If not, I guess I better
> rebuild from source.
> N.
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Noel Welsh <noelwelsh at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've merged the changes back into for.rkt and pushed the changes. This
> > is just refactoring the in-vector code. I'll do a separate commit when
> > I modify in-fXvector. And yes, tests all pass :)
> >
> > N.
> _________________________________________________
>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev

Posted on the dev mailing list.