<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Apr 20, 2014, at 8:51 PM, Daniel Prager wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: 'Lucida Grande'; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; "><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>Animation: I'm finding this too. Suggestions welcome on profiling / optimising from someone who understands the mechanics of (big-bang)</span></blockquote></div><br><div><br></div><div>The big-bang library imposes a lot of overhead to make sure it works well for novice students, and I mean very novice students. So yes, there is a lot of room for improvement here. </div><div><br></div><div>One day I will have spare time and then I will create a slimed down version of big-bang, little-poof? </div><div><br></div><div>-- Matthias</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></body></html>