<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Hello,<br>
<br>
I have been trawling through the packages at:<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://pkg.racket-lang.org">http://pkg.racket-lang.org</a><br>
<br>
And have found that very few of the packages have any licensing
information<br>
and are effectively proprietary software, despite what their authors
may have<br>
intended. I can therefore study them, but not use them without
breaking<br>
copyright law. For a hobbyist this is easy enough to overlook, but
for anyone<br>
wanting to use Racket commercially this means that most of the
packages are<br>
unusable without contacting the authors and seeing what terms they
are<br>
prepared to license their code under.<br>
<br>
This is a big enough pain for packages outside the main
distribution, but I have<br>
also noticed that packages in the main distribution do not contain
licence<br>
information either. A typical example is:<br>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<a href="https://pkg.racket-lang.org/info/html-lib">https://pkg.racket-lang.org/info/html-lib</a><br>
<br>
In html/html.rkt, it contains:<br>
copyright by Paul Graunke June 2000 AD<br>
<br>
But has no licensing info anywhere in the package. This was
presumably LGPL<br>
code that was extracted to a package from the main racket
repository. Without<br>
that licensing information it contravenes the terms of the LGPL and
more<br>
importantly, to me, means I can't use it as it hasn't been licensed
for use by anyone<br>
through that package.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
<br>
<br>
Lorry<br>
<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
vLife Systems Ltd
Registered Office: The Meridian, 4 Copthall House, Station Square, Coventry, CV1 2FL
Registered in England and Wales No. 06477649
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://vlifesystems.com">http://vlifesystems.com</a>
</pre>
</body>
</html>