<div dir="ltr">No problem, Matthew, I know that I've been less-than-specific, here's what I can say:<div><br></div><div style>Since 5.3.2, I've seen about 7 crashes, they all act the same: Win7 suddenly says "the program is not responding". At least twice it's happened when I hit the debugger button in DrRacket. Otherwise it feels random (at least once when clicking on the definitions window, at least once when simply running a program in the interactions pane).</div>
<div style><br></div><div style>Thanks,</div><div style>-Joe</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Matthew Flatt <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mflatt@cs.utah.edu" target="_blank">mflatt@cs.utah.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">FWIW, I'm not ignoring your reports of crashes on 64-bit Windows, but I<br>
haven't yet done enough work on it. I'm still looking for a way to<br>
provoke crashes, and the thought that the debugger might be relevant is<br>
helpful.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
At Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:08:59 -0800, Joe Gilray wrote:<br>
> I had a problem with my test code that led me to believe that the 64-bit<br>
> version of 5.3.3 was faster than the 32-bit version... to paraphrase SNL<br>
> from the good old days: "never mind."<br>
><br>
> I still do see crashes on the 64-bit version and not on 32-bit: The<br>
> crashes still seem random, but do seem to occur more often in the debugger.<br>
><br>
> Regards,<br>
> -Joe<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Joe Gilray <<a href="mailto:jgilray@gmail.com">jgilray@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> > Has anyone else noticed that the 64-bit version on Win7 is faster than the<br>
> > 32-bit version?<br>
> ><br>
> > I thought that the longer pointers were supposed to slow down execution.<br>
> ><br>
> > BTW, still seeing some crashes on 64-bit and none on 32-bit<br>
> ><br>
> > Thoughts?<br>
> > -Joe<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Joe Gilray <<a href="mailto:jgilray@gmail.com">jgilray@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> >> Thanks Racketeers,<br>
> >><br>
> >> I am still seeing crashes on Win7 64bit with 5.3.3. About every 6 hours<br>
> >> or so I get "program not responding" (doesn't seem to correlate to anything<br>
> >> in particular).<br>
> >><br>
> >> Haven't seen it on Win7 32 bit.<br>
> >><br>
> >> -Joe<br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Eli Barzilay <<a href="mailto:eli@barzilay.org">eli@barzilay.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> >><br>
> >>> Racket version 5.3.3 is now available from<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> <a href="http://racket-lang.org/" target="_blank">http://racket-lang.org/</a><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> This is a bug-fix release to address a flaw in DrRacket v5.3.2<br>
> >>> concerning interactions between the contour window and the syntax<br>
> >>> coloring.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Feedback Welcome,<br>
> >>> --<br>
> >>> ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:<br>
> >>> <a href="http://barzilay.org/" target="_blank">http://barzilay.org/</a> Maze is Life!<br>
> >>> ____________________<br>
> >>> Racket Users list:<br>
> >>> <a href="http://lists.racket-lang.org/users" target="_blank">http://lists.racket-lang.org/users</a><br>
> >>><br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> ><br>
> ____________________<br>
> Racket Users list:<br>
> <a href="http://lists.racket-lang.org/users" target="_blank">http://lists.racket-lang.org/users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>