<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;"><DIV>To All,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I was wondering if anyone has ever created a real time operating system with Racket. As well as, create applications within a FPGA device by utilizing racket?? Can racket be a solution to ALL PROBLEMS that is the question.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>David Blubaugh</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><BR><BR>--- On <B>Wed, 12/5/12, users-request@racket-lang.org <I><users-request@racket-lang.org></I></B> wrote:<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><BR>From: users-request@racket-lang.org <users-request@racket-lang.org><BR>Subject: users Digest, Vol 88, Issue 18<BR>To: users@racket-lang.org<BR>Date: Wednesday, December 5, 2012, 10:30 AM<BR><BR>
<DIV class=plainMail>Send users mailing list submissions to<BR> <A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=users@racket-lang.org" ymailto="mailto:users@racket-lang.org">users@racket-lang.org</A><BR><BR>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<BR> <A href="http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/listinfo" target=_blank>http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/listinfo</A><BR>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<BR> <A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=users-request@racket-lang.org" ymailto="mailto:users-request@racket-lang.org">users-request@racket-lang.org</A><BR><BR>You can reach the person managing the list at<BR> <A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=users-owner@racket-lang.org" ymailto="mailto:users-owner@racket-lang.org">users-owner@racket-lang.org</A><BR><BR>When replying, please edit your Subject line
so it is more specific<BR>than "Re: Contents of users digest..."<BR><BR><BR>[Racket Users list:<BR><A href="http://lists.racket-lang.org/users" target=_blank>http://lists.racket-lang.org/users</A>]<BR><BR><BR>Today's Topics:<BR><BR> 1. Re: Whats the difference between a predicate and a flat<BR> contract? (Harry Spier)<BR> 2. Re: Whats the difference between a predicate and a flat<BR> contract? (Robby Findler)<BR> 3. Re: DRRacket right-click menu fragility in Linux. (Neil Toronto)<BR> 4. Re: minimum spanning tree (Matthias Felleisen)<BR><BR><BR>----------------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 1<BR>Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:59:42 -0500<BR>From: Harry Spier <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vasishtha.spier@gmail.com"
ymailto="mailto:vasishtha.spier@gmail.com">vasishtha.spier@gmail.com</A>><BR>To: Robby Findler <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=robby@eecs.northwestern.edu" ymailto="mailto:robby@eecs.northwestern.edu">robby@eecs.northwestern.edu</A>><BR>Cc: Carl Eastlund <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cce@ccs.neu.edu" ymailto="mailto:cce@ccs.neu.edu">cce@ccs.neu.edu</A>>, users <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=users@racket-lang.org" ymailto="mailto:users@racket-lang.org">users@racket-lang.org</A>><BR>Subject: Re: [racket] Whats the difference between a predicate and a<BR> flat contract?<BR>Message-ID:<BR> <CAJ3b0o9_yd-j4U6tbEOQaB+JKWto_A1XwSrh3_xyRTk=Uviy=<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=Q@mail.gmail.com" ymailto="mailto:Q@mail.gmail.com">Q@mail.gmail.com</A>><BR>Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=UTF-8<BR><BR>Are flat-contract and flat-contract-predicate equivalent?<BR><BR>> ((flat-contract 'x) 'x)<BR>#t<BR>> ((flat-contract-predicate 'x) 'x)<BR>#t<BR>> ((flat-contract 'x) 'y)<BR>#f<BR>> ((flat-contract-predicate 'x) 'y)<BR>#f<BR>><BR><BR>Harry<BR><BR>On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Robby Findler<BR><<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=robby@eecs.northwestern.edu" ymailto="mailto:robby@eecs.northwestern.edu">robby@eecs.northwestern.edu</A>> wrote:<BR>> It does that for symbols, but not everything.<BR>><BR>> This is the place you should be looking, I think.<BR>><BR>> <A href="http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/contracts.html" target=_blank>http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/contracts.html</A><BR>><BR>> Robby<BR>><BR>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Harry Spier <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vasishtha.spier@gmail.com"
ymailto="mailto:vasishtha.spier@gmail.com">vasishtha.spier@gmail.com</A>> wrote:<BR>>> OK I see the docs to flat-contract? but not flat-contract<BR>>> <A href="http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/contract-utilities.html#" target=_blank>http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/contract-utilities.html#</A>(def._((lib._racket/contract/private/misc..rkt)._flat-contract~3f))<BR>>> mention that flat-contracts are more than predicates. Those docs<BR>>> don't mention it, but it appears from experimentation that<BR>>> (flat-contract something) produces a procedure such that<BR>>> ((flat-contract something) x) is #t if something eq? x .<BR>>><BR>>> Harry Spier<BR>>><BR>>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Robby Findler<BR>>> <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=robby@eecs.northwestern.edu" ymailto="mailto:robby@eecs.northwestern.edu">robby@eecs.northwestern.edu</A>>
wrote:<BR>>>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Carl Eastlund <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cce@ccs.neu.edu" ymailto="mailto:cce@ccs.neu.edu">cce@ccs.neu.edu</A>> wrote:<BR>>>>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Robby Findler <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=robby@eecs.northwestern.edu" ymailto="mailto:robby@eecs.northwestern.edu">robby@eecs.northwestern.edu</A>><BR>>>>> wrote:<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> Flat contracts includes more things than contracts. For example:<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> [robby@yanpu] ~/git/plt/collects/scribblings/reference$ racket<BR>>>>>> Welcome to Racket v5.3.1.9.<BR>>>>>> > (flat-contract? 'x)<BR>>>>>> #t<BR>>>>>> > (procedure? 'x)<BR>>>>>> #f<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> The flat-contract
function is a holdover from the days when flat contracts<BR>>>>>> weren't able to be used directly as predicate functions.<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> I'll push a clarification to the docs for flat-contract.<BR>>>>><BR>>>>><BR>>>>> Isn't that the wrong way around? The flat-contract function lets you use a<BR>>>>> predicate as a contract, not a contract as a predicate. Presumably it's<BR>>>>> from before predicates could be used as contracts, although I hadn't<BR>>>>> realized there was such a time.<BR>>>><BR>>>> There was a time when you had to call 'flat-contract' to turn a<BR>>>> predicate into a contract, yep. There was a housecleaning (anyone<BR>>>> remember the days when there were multiple suffixes (not just "/c") on<BR>>>> the combinators?) and I probably should
have gotten rid of it at that<BR>>>> time, but I didn't.<BR>>>><BR>>>> (Oh and I mean "contracts" where I wrote "preducate functions" above. Oops.)<BR>>>><BR>>>> Robby<BR><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 2<BR>Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:05:45 -0600<BR>From: Robby Findler <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=robby@eecs.northwestern.edu" ymailto="mailto:robby@eecs.northwestern.edu">robby@eecs.northwestern.edu</A>><BR>To: Harry Spier <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vasishtha.spier@gmail.com" ymailto="mailto:vasishtha.spier@gmail.com">vasishtha.spier@gmail.com</A>><BR>Cc: Carl Eastlund <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cce@ccs.neu.edu" ymailto="mailto:cce@ccs.neu.edu">cce@ccs.neu.edu</A>>, users <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=users@racket-lang.org"
ymailto="mailto:users@racket-lang.org">users@racket-lang.org</A>><BR>Subject: Re: [racket] Whats the difference between a predicate and a<BR> flat contract?<BR>Message-ID:<BR> <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=CAL3TdOMVL4xerBMr9xWqNz3tPjxbSXDfjaiJro2N9j6fxrSrOQ@mail.gmail.com" ymailto="mailto:CAL3TdOMVL4xerBMr9xWqNz3tPjxbSXDfjaiJro2N9j6fxrSrOQ@mail.gmail.com">CAL3TdOMVL4xerBMr9xWqNz3tPjxbSXDfjaiJro2N9j6fxrSrOQ@mail.gmail.com</A>><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8<BR><BR>Yes ..., I think so (well, eq? probably messes things up, as usual).<BR><BR>But that's a funny question! What's really going on there is that<BR>flat-contract is coercing the value into a contract, and flat<BR>contracts also acts as predicate functions (matching what the<BR>contracts match). flat-contract-predicate takes its argument, turns it<BR>into the contract and then returns the predicate.
This last step is<BR>useless, as flat-contracts are now predicates without any coercion<BR>(again, not something that was always the case).<BR><BR>I'll add a similar note to the docs for this function too.<BR><BR>Robby<BR><BR>On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Harry Spier <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vasishtha.spier@gmail.com" ymailto="mailto:vasishtha.spier@gmail.com">vasishtha.spier@gmail.com</A>> wrote:<BR>> Are flat-contract and flat-contract-predicate equivalent?<BR>><BR>>> ((flat-contract 'x) 'x)<BR>> #t<BR>>> ((flat-contract-predicate 'x) 'x)<BR>> #t<BR>>> ((flat-contract 'x) 'y)<BR>> #f<BR>>> ((flat-contract-predicate 'x) 'y)<BR>> #f<BR>>><BR>><BR>> Harry<BR>><BR>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Robby Findler<BR>> <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=robby@eecs.northwestern.edu"
ymailto="mailto:robby@eecs.northwestern.edu">robby@eecs.northwestern.edu</A>> wrote:<BR>>> It does that for symbols, but not everything.<BR>>><BR>>> This is the place you should be looking, I think.<BR>>><BR>>> <A href="http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/contracts.html" target=_blank>http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/contracts.html</A><BR>>><BR>>> Robby<BR>>><BR>>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Harry Spier <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vasishtha.spier@gmail.com" ymailto="mailto:vasishtha.spier@gmail.com">vasishtha.spier@gmail.com</A>> wrote:<BR>>>> OK I see the docs to flat-contract? but not flat-contract<BR>>>> <A href="http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/contract-utilities.html#"
target=_blank>http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/contract-utilities.html#</A>(def._((lib._racket/contract/private/misc..rkt)._flat-contract~3f))<BR>>>> mention that flat-contracts are more than predicates. Those docs<BR>>>> don't mention it, but it appears from experimentation that<BR>>>> (flat-contract something) produces a procedure such that<BR>>>> ((flat-contract something) x) is #t if something eq? x .<BR>>>><BR>>>> Harry Spier<BR>>>><BR>>>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Robby Findler<BR>>>> <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=robby@eecs.northwestern.edu" ymailto="mailto:robby@eecs.northwestern.edu">robby@eecs.northwestern.edu</A>> wrote:<BR>>>>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Carl Eastlund <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cce@ccs.neu.edu"
ymailto="mailto:cce@ccs.neu.edu">cce@ccs.neu.edu</A>> wrote:<BR>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Robby Findler <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=robby@eecs.northwestern.edu" ymailto="mailto:robby@eecs.northwestern.edu">robby@eecs.northwestern.edu</A>><BR>>>>>> wrote:<BR>>>>>>><BR>>>>>>> Flat contracts includes more things than contracts. For example:<BR>>>>>>><BR>>>>>>> [robby@yanpu] ~/git/plt/collects/scribblings/reference$ racket<BR>>>>>>> Welcome to Racket v5.3.1.9.<BR>>>>>>> > (flat-contract? 'x)<BR>>>>>>> #t<BR>>>>>>> > (procedure? 'x)<BR>>>>>>> #f<BR>>>>>>><BR>>>>>>> The flat-contract function is a holdover from the days when flat contracts<BR>>>>>>> weren't able
to be used directly as predicate functions.<BR>>>>>>><BR>>>>>>><BR>>>>>>> I'll push a clarification to the docs for flat-contract.<BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>><BR>>>>>> Isn't that the wrong way around? The flat-contract function lets you use a<BR>>>>>> predicate as a contract, not a contract as a predicate. Presumably it's<BR>>>>>> from before predicates could be used as contracts, although I hadn't<BR>>>>>> realized there was such a time.<BR>>>>><BR>>>>> There was a time when you had to call 'flat-contract' to turn a<BR>>>>> predicate into a contract, yep. There was a housecleaning (anyone<BR>>>>> remember the days when there were multiple suffixes (not just "/c") on<BR>>>>> the combinators?) and I probably should have gotten rid of it at
that<BR>>>>> time, but I didn't.<BR>>>>><BR>>>>> (Oh and I mean "contracts" where I wrote "preducate functions" above. Oops.)<BR>>>>><BR>>>>> Robby<BR><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 3<BR>Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 21:30:23 -0700<BR>From: Neil Toronto <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=neil.toronto@gmail.com" ymailto="mailto:neil.toronto@gmail.com">neil.toronto@gmail.com</A>><BR>To: <A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=users@racket-lang.org" ymailto="mailto:users@racket-lang.org">users@racket-lang.org</A><BR>Subject: Re: [racket] DRRacket right-click menu fragility in Linux.<BR>Message-ID: <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=50BECDDF.4030508@gmail.com" ymailto="mailto:50BECDDF.4030508@gmail.com">50BECDDF.4030508@gmail.com</A>><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed<BR><BR>Could what
you're experiencing have anything to do with tooltips? It <BR>seems my right-click menu doesn't stay up whenever there's a tooltip <BR>out. Which is, like, every time I want it.<BR><BR>Neil ?<BR><BR>On 12/04/2012 07:55 PM, Ray Racine wrote:<BR>> Yea, I didn't want to make a big deal out of it, but the up/down button<BR>> change did not fix the issue. In fact I'd say no impact positive or<BR>> negative.<BR>><BR>> It seems to happen when there is additional drawing 'complexity' in<BR>> co-occurrence with the pop up drawing area. I.e. the pop up menu is<BR>> drawing where arrows are drawn or error highlighting is occurring etc.<BR>> Also maybe when the pop up menu area is near the 'edge' of the Dr window<BR>> and or pane area. But again the problem is not consistently<BR>> reproducible yet happens more often then not. Its not a once in a blue<BR>> moon that thing. Sometimes an
attempt to right click pop up menu will<BR>> fail numerous times in a row then succeed for no apparent reason.<BR>><BR>> On Dec 4, 2012 9:07 PM, "Robby Findler" <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=robby@eecs.northwestern.edu" ymailto="mailto:robby@eecs.northwestern.edu">robby@eecs.northwestern.edu</A><BR>> <mailto:<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=robby@eecs.northwestern.edu" ymailto="mailto:robby@eecs.northwestern.edu">robby@eecs.northwestern.edu</A>>> wrote:<BR>><BR>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Stephen Chang <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=stchang@ccs.neu.edu" ymailto="mailto:stchang@ccs.neu.edu">stchang@ccs.neu.edu</A><BR>> <mailto:<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=stchang@ccs.neu.edu" ymailto="mailto:stchang@ccs.neu.edu">stchang@ccs.neu.edu</A>>>
wrote:<BR>> > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Robby Findler<BR>> > <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=robby@eecs.northwestern.edu" ymailto="mailto:robby@eecs.northwestern.edu">robby@eecs.northwestern.edu</A><BR>> <mailto:<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=robby@eecs.northwestern.edu" ymailto="mailto:robby@eecs.northwestern.edu">robby@eecs.northwestern.edu</A>>> wrote:<BR>> >> I've pushed a fix to this. Thanks to Matthew for looking into it and<BR>> >> sorting it out and sorry for the delay.<BR>> ><BR>> > I'm using git head and I'm still seeing this problem (Ubuntu<BR>> 11.10). I<BR>> > can't reliably reproduce it but in case it helps, it most
recently<BR>> > happened when I selected tack arrows and now I can't bring up the<BR>> menu<BR>> > to untack the arrows anymore.<BR>> ><BR>><BR>> The particular fix Matthew pointed me to is popping up the menu on a<BR>> mouse down event, not a mouse up event.<BR>><BR>> <A href="http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/blobdiff/27aa99944657c5827eee3772f715df7dd971d1e0..0377bda9474f8848a97509ace898174c83361006:/collects/framework/private/keymap.rkt" target=_blank>http://git.racket-lang.org/plt/blobdiff/27aa99944657c5827eee3772f715df7dd971d1e0..0377bda9474f8848a97509ace898174c83361006:/collects/framework/private/keymap.rkt</A><BR>><BR>> So I guess there's something else going on, too (because that's the<BR>> code that
pops up the menu with the check syntax items).<BR>><BR>> Robby<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>> ____________________<BR>> Racket Users list:<BR>> <A href="http://lists.racket-lang.org/users" target=_blank>http://lists.racket-lang.org/users</A><BR>><BR><BR><BR><BR>------------------------------<BR><BR>Message: 4<BR>Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 10:30:22 -0500<BR>From: Matthias Felleisen <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=matthias@ccs.neu.edu" ymailto="mailto:matthias@ccs.neu.edu">matthias@ccs.neu.edu</A>><BR>To: Pierpaolo Bernardi <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=olopierpa@gmail.com" ymailto="mailto:olopierpa@gmail.com">olopierpa@gmail.com</A>><BR>Cc: Racket mailing list <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=users@racket-lang.org" ymailto="mailto:users@racket-lang.org">users@racket-lang.org</A>><BR>Subject: Re: [racket]
minimum spanning tree<BR>Message-ID: <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=CE678990-63D0-4400-AF2A-C6B2880E4FFB@ccs.neu.edu" ymailto="mailto:CE678990-63D0-4400-AF2A-C6B2880E4FFB@ccs.neu.edu">CE678990-63D0-4400-AF2A-C6B2880E4FFB@ccs.neu.edu</A>><BR>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<BR><BR><BR>You are making a very good point here, especially the last one, <BR>which in a sense exposes the folly of Perlis's maxim (it is better<BR>to have one data type with a 100 operations than 10 data types <BR>with 10 operations each). One, the maxim biases programmers <BR>and before they know it, they have introduced bad dependences <BR>and performance problems and whoknowswhat. <BR><BR>---------------------------------------------------------------<BR><BR>Having said that, I think Ian's point is equally good. So here<BR>is what I am wondering. <BR><BR>Isn't the case of graphs worth a case study where we define <BR>a WIDE interface
for graphs and their operations, which we <BR>can do so with contracts. Then we implement it in several <BR>different ways and conduct performance studies (small and<BR>large). And we advertise, which library is good for which <BR>kind of scenario. <BR><BR>I am sure that some data structure person has done this<BR>for C++ or some such language. The Saarbr?cken MPI 1 comes<BR>to mind. BUT, I am also sure that we don't have it and that<BR>we would benefit from having one. <BR><BR>NOW: as we conduct this study, we might be able to articulate<BR>performance "contracts" (that's probably the wrong word) and<BR>possibly learn how to add those to library implementations as<BR>a secondary interface. Doing so would once again distinguish<BR>Racket from other programming languages. <BR><BR>It is probably a dissertation, possibly more. <BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>On Dec 4, 2012, at 5:36 AM, Pierpaolo Bernardi
wrote:<BR><BR>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 5:07 PM, J. Ian Johnson <<A href="http://us.mc1133.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=ianj@ccs.neu.edu" ymailto="mailto:ianj@ccs.neu.edu">ianj@ccs.neu.edu</A>> wrote:<BR>>> Graph algorithms are often meant to be very fast, and different algorithms necessitate different representations. Two popular representations are adjacency lists and shared structures.<BR>> <BR>> The representations usually used in general purpose graphs libraries<BR>> are adiacency lists and incidence matrices.<BR>> <BR>> Two good examples that I know of are: Knuth's Stanford GraphBase<BR>> (available from his home page and in published book form), and the<BR>> Combinatorica library for Mathematica (code available freely on the<BR>> net, manual available as a published book "Computational Discrete<BR>> Mathematics" by Skiena & Pemmaraju).<BR>> <BR>>> It also isn't right to call them lists
unless you're talking about multigraphs. Indeed successor nodes should be treated as a set, but Racket's sets have quite a bit of overhead, especially for small sets. Should it be fast to compute predecessor nodes? There are too many considerations for there to be just one blessed representation, IMHO.<BR>> <BR>> Linked lists made of cons pairs are not the best data structure for<BR>> every possible use of a sequence data structure. However, we find<BR>> this data structure very useful, don't we? we force them into uses<BR>> for which they are not optimal, because of the convenience of having<BR>> available a vast library using them. And when we can't fit them to our<BR>> purpose we use a more specialized data structure.<BR>> <BR>> I think a similar compromise for a graph data structure would be very useful.<BR>> <BR>> Cheers<BR>> P.<BR>> <BR>> ____________________<BR>> Racket Users
list:<BR>> <A href="http://lists.racket-lang.org/users" target=_blank>http://lists.racket-lang.org/users</A><BR><BR>-------------- next part --------------<BR>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<BR>Name: smime.p7s<BR>Type: application/pkcs7-signature<BR>Size: 4373 bytes<BR>Desc: not available<BR>URL: <<A href="http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20121205/52954024/attachment.p7s" target=_blank>http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20121205/52954024/attachment.p7s</A>><BR><BR>End of users Digest, Vol 88, Issue 18<BR>*************************************<BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></td></tr></table>