Because x11-racket compilation depends on an environment variable to decide if it should compile with debug info or not.<br>So if I want to recompile with a different debug option without
modifying the source files it seems I need to remove the `compiled'
directories, right?<br>It seems that `raco setup' does not recompile if the source have not changed (based on a hash I presume, since touching the files does not force recompilation either).<br>The `--force' option does not do what I want either it seems.<br>
<br>Or maybe there is a better way to do that?<br><br>Laurent<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Matthew Flatt <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mflatt@cs.utah.edu" target="_blank">mflatt@cs.utah.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">`raco setup -c' is intended to reset a whole installation, and so it<br>
doesn't adapt well to having a collection specified.<br>
<br>
Can you explain more why you need `raco setup -c my-collect' instead of<br>
just `raco setup my-collect'?<br>
<div><div class="h5"><br>
At Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:35:01 +0100, Laurent wrote:<br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
> Doing<br>
> $ raco setup -c my-collect<br>
> takes about 30s to "bootstrap from source", and it does that for each such<br>
> invocation.<br>
><br>
> Is it possible to reduce this time? It makes "raco setup -c" almost<br>
> unusable.<br>
><br>
> Laurent<br>
</div></div>> ____________________<br>
> Racket Users list:<br>
> <a href="http://lists.racket-lang.org/users" target="_blank">http://lists.racket-lang.org/users</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>