<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Dec 19, 2011, at 5:02 PM, Racket Noob wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: 'Lucida Grande'; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; "><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 13px; ">Jordan, beautiful are your ideas and suggestions, but unfortunately, I think that they are futile. Why do I say this? I think that Racket primarily serves to a specific group of people as an inexhaustible source for mass-production of always the same academic articles, and much less for everyday, practical programming.</span></span></blockquote></div><br><div><br></div><div>Is your goal to turn off every single core and non-core member on this list? Or do you actually care?  </div><div><br></div><div><br></div></body></html>