<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "><br>On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:05:23 -0500, Robby Findler wrote:<br>>On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:01 PM, John Clements<br> ><<a href="mailto:clements@brinckerhoff.org" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 204); ">clements@brinckerhoff.org</a>> wrote:<br>>>?In my world, a change will fall into the "yes, racket is a rapidly changing language" bin;<br> >> it's not unusual for much of my old code to be broken.<br>><br>>I realize this is a meta question, but is this the world we really<br>>want Racket to be in?<br>><br>>Robby<br></span><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "><br> </span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">It's a world I don't mind Racket being in. Broken code is usually just finding where the old library is hidden, and at least the syntax never changes... I can read and understand the new stuff.</span></div> <div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "><br></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); ">Pat</span></div>