ok, never mind. <br>I did not use it for a planet package, as it was specifically mentioned as unstable,<br>but it was handy for my local "planet" packages.<br>Thanks.<br>Laurent<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 19:15, Carl Eastlund <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cce@ccs.neu.edu">cce@ccs.neu.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">It has been removed. It was in an odd position as a planet utility in<br> the unstable collection; planet developers were not supposed to rely<br> on it, so we did not look in planet packages to see if anyone used it<br> there (probably our mistake), and nothing in the collections was using<br> it. It would not be hard to put back, and you can still see the<br> original source code for it in (planet cce/scheme). That package is<br> no longer actively maintained, but most of it still works. In<br> general, I think we need a better policy for planet utilities and the<br> unstable collection.<br> <font color="#888888"><br> Carl Eastlund<br> </font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br> On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Laurent <<a href="mailto:laurent.orseau@gmail.com">laurent.orseau@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br> > Hi,<br> ><br> > `define-planet-package' from require/unstable was quite handy.<br> > Has it been replaced by something else or has it been removed for good?<br> ><br> ><br> > Laurent<br> </div></div></blockquote></div><br>