<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
> From: sk@cs.brown.edu<br>> Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 10:45:17 -0400<br>> Subject: Re: [racket] Math Guidance<br>> To: wookiz@hotmail.com<br>> CC: users@racket-lang.org<br>> <br>> > Come now Shiram, there are lots of people who don't want to go to CS grad<br>> > school, didn't go to a name school and/or maybe don't have the stellar GPA<br>> > that the likes of Google tend to look for.<br>> <br>> Your mistake is in assuming that the "likes of Google" look for<br>> "stellar GPA"s. My experience suggests otherwise.<br>> <br>> > It doesn't make them poorly trained.<br>> <br>> You created a false equality and then knocked it down. I sure hope<br>> you don't reason about programs the same way. (-:<br>> <br>> > The point is that CS grads are doing worse than comparable<br>> > graduates of other disciplines.<br>> <br>> Based on data with lots of questionable assumptions. If it turns out<br>> the assumptions are wrong, maybe they're actually doing quite well.<br>> Are you perhaps suffering from selection bias?<br>> <br>> And this still doesn't justify your remarks about courses.<br>> <br>> Okay, troll confirmed. I really will stop now.<br>> <br><br>Mate. I realize that for a CS professor agreeing with this stuff is kind of like a turkey voting for Christmas but seriously you should chill.<br><br>If you are going to throw out a presumption as loose as that these CS grads are "poorly trained" then you should cut others some slack on the assumptions they make.<br><br>Since this seems to be getting a bit personal I will address some other issues you are raising off line.<br><br><br>                                            </body>
</html>