<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 19:01, Matthew Flatt <<a href="mailto:mflatt@cs.utah.edu">mflatt@cs.utah.edu</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> I've been planning to add something like `define-runtime-module-path' that does not require the module but that causes all of its dependencies to be included in an executable. I'll move that up on my list of things to do. </blockquote><div> Excellent! May I ask you to inform me when/if that is done? Thanks a lot, thank you all for your answers. Laurent </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> <div><div></div><div class="h5"> At Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:02:59 -0500, Robby Findler wrote: > DrRacket does not, that's right. I think you'd have to do something to > tell your distribution packer about the dynamically required files > from the outside, I'm sorry to say. > > AT least I don't see a better way, but maybe others do. > > Robby > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Laurent <<a href="mailto:laurent.orseau@gmail.com">laurent.orseau@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 17:38, Robby Findler <<a href="mailto:robby@eecs.northwestern.edu">robby@eecs.northwestern.edu</a>> > > wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Laurent <<a href="mailto:laurent.orseau@gmail.com">laurent.orseau@gmail.com</a>> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 17:06, Laurent <<a href="mailto:laurent.orseau@gmail.com">laurent.orseau@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 16:43, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <<a href="mailto:samth@ccs.neu.edu">samth@ccs.neu.edu</a>> > >> >> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Laurent <<a href="mailto:laurent.orseau@gmail.com">laurent.orseau@gmail.com</a>> > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > > >> >>> > So now, how do I make things work with `dynamic-require' ? > >> >>> > Do all paths need to be defined as runtime-paths in my "splash.rkt", > >> >>> > to use only normal relative paths in dynamically required files? > >> >>> > Or can I get completely rid of runtime-path? > >> >>> > >> >>> I believe that you should add: > >> >>> > >> >>> (define-runtime-module-path name require-path) > >> >>> > >> > > >> > One caveat though: since such modules sub-dependencies are not "files" > >> > anymore, > >> > framework/splash won't recognize them, and then gauge in the > >> > splashscreen > >> > will not > >> > animate smoothly but will be binary. > >> > >> I think the splash doesn't animate anymore because the files are > >> already loaded by define-runtime-module-path. > >> > > > > Is there a way around this? > > > > Or does this mean DrRacket does not use define-runtime-module-path? > > > > > > </div></div>> _________________________________________________ > For list-related administrative tasks: > <a href="http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users" target="_blank">http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users</a> </blockquote></div>