<div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">IIUC, the request is for us to build .deb files, which means that you'd need to get it manually. A nicer thing that involves more work would be to make our server usable as a package repository, but together with making it a yum repository this sounds like a non-trivial amount of work. Yet one level above that is becoming the maintainer of the debian (and ubuntu, and fedora, etc etc) package, which leads to a whole bunch of additional bureaucracy... </blockquote></div> Personally, just a .deb on Racket's website would be just fine. A release for apt-get would be awesome, but as you detail, I'm not sure that is worth the investment, unless you want Racket to be a lot more visible (e.g., there aren't many things under "Scheme" in Ubuntu's software center, that would make Racket quite visible).