<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Carl Eastlund <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:carl.eastlund@gmail.com">carl.eastlund@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
It doesn't matter where you put it. DrScheme doesn't save a compiled<br>
version of the *file itself* that you are running -- because, with<br>
unsaved edits, that may not correspond to the file on disk, anyway.<br>
DrScheme only saves compiled versions of dependencies (via "require")<br>
that it has to read from disk.<br>
<br>
That is the behavior I see, anyway. If I create a file "b.ss" that<br>
requires "a.ss", I can look in the compiled/ subtree and find a<br>
compiled version of "a.ss" but not of "b.ss".<br>
<br>
Carl Eastlund<br>
<br>
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Robby Findler<br>
<div class="im"><<a href="mailto:robby@eecs.northwestern.edu">robby@eecs.northwestern.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">> I'm sorry, I wasn't clear. Anywhere in the result of<br>
> current-library-collection-paths isn't touched in this manner (and<br>
> that is set by the PLTCOLLECTS environment variable and other things).<br>
><br>
> Robby<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>Ok, thank you both, I got it working now.<br><br>I have always used the collects path as an general mechanism for finding Scheme modules. So, should I use requires in the form of "foo.ss", "../bar/main.ss" etc. instead? Wouldn't that hard code the module locations in my Scheme files?<br>
<br>-- <br>tomppa<br>