<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Noel Welsh wrote at 10/12/2008 06:59 PM: <blockquote cite="mid:c2b7813c0810121559n1c5e38d6s443d58d809f6218e@mail.gmail.com" type="cite"> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">I'd love to see PLT on Android. </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> PLT Scheme, or a Scheme-like language? </pre> </blockquote> Scheme enough that we can use libraries written in Scheme. A bunch of people have put a lot of work into writing good libraries for Scheme. For me to move to a Scheme-like language that can't reuse our Scheme library investment would seem masochistic. I'd be fine with a Scheme that had all of R5RS except for "call/cc" and mutability of strings. </body> </html>