<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16414" name=GENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=#ffffff> <DIV>Hi,</DIV> <DIV>The docs on syntax-e do not describe what they return for #'#&x or</DIV> <DIV>#'#hash((x . y)). I found the following</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>;Welcome to DrScheme, version 369.8-svn19mar2007 [3m].<BR>;Language: Textual (MzScheme, includes R5RS) custom.<BR>(unbox (syntax-e #'#&x)) ;--> syntax<BR>(syntax-e (unbox (syntax-e #'#&x))) ;--> x<BR>(syntax-e #'#hash((x . y))) ;--> #<hash-table><BR>(hash-table-map (syntax-e #'#hash((x . y))) cons) ;--> ((x . y))<BR>(hash-table-map (syntax-e #'#hasheq((x . y))) cons) ;--> ((x . y))</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>To me this seems inconsistent, but may be there is a specific reason for syntax-e to show the contents of a hash-table unwrapped from syntaxes.</DIV> <DIV>Is there?</DIV> <DIV>Jos koot</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>(((((lambda(x)((((((((x x)x)x)x)x)x)x)x))<BR>    (lambda(x)(lambda(y)(x(x y)))))<BR>   (lambda(x)(x)x))<BR>  (lambda()(printf "Greetings, Jos~n"))))</DIV></BODY></HTML>