<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
No, no structured tests, sorry. I was working on an other problem,<br>
using the XML collection provided with mzscheme; and I wanted to<br>
get rid of all whitespace of intermediate nodes (i.e. not leafs) of the<br>
xexpr. <br>
<br>
--Hans<br>
<br>
<br>
Jim Blandy schreef:
<blockquote
cite="mid8f2776cb0603190930m4a816586u2572502ded0856c6@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 3/19/06, Hans Oesterholt-Dijkema <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:hans@elemental-programming.org"><hans@elemental-programming.org></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">It looks to me that, compared to perl, the pregexp library
of mzscheme is very slow.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Just out of curiousity --- did you measure this in some disciplined
way, or was it just an observation based on playing with the data and
problem you had on hand?
I'm asking not because I want to argue with you, but because I'd like
to do some measurements like that myself of a different regexp
implementation.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>