[racket] the typed Values restriction

From: Benjamin Greenman (blg59 at cornell.edu)
Date: Wed Mar 18 17:20:33 EDT 2015

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Michael Wilber <gcr at sneakygcr.net> wrote:

> this doesn't work in vanilla Racket

Sure, but it works without the let! For context, I ran into this issue
adding types to a function originally written in continuation passing
style. Switching to cons was an easy fix.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20150318/586acdbb/attachment.html>

Posted on the users mailing list.