From: Greg Hendershott (greghendershott at gmail.com) Date: Tue Mar 10 17:19:25 EDT 2015 |
|
>> Is there a way to coerce racket to be more specific in its messages? Although I don't know if it would do better with this particular error, generally errortrace gives much better stack traces: http://docs.racket-lang.org/errortrace/quick-instructions.html It does so by instrumenting the code. Which means it will run more slowly. Which I imagine is why it's not enabled by default.
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|