[racket] Void expression found
They CAN return no values: (values)
It is just awkward because you get an error in the binding forms if you try
to name the result (because there is none.)
Jay
On Monday, January 5, 2015, Jack Firth <jackhfirth at gmail.com> wrote:
> Given that racket has multiple return values, what sort of issues would
> arise if functions were allowed to return no values at all instead of
> opting to return the single value void when they have nothing to return? Is
> it purely a backwards compatibility thing, or are there more fundamental
> problems with that?
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Hendrik Boom <hendrik at topoi.pooq.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','hendrik at topoi.pooq.com');>> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 05:58:31PM -0500, Sean Kanaley wrote:
>> > I see "void" as a tangible value specifying no information, whereas
>> > "undefined" is literally no information. So void is more like an empty
>> > universe and undefined is no universe at all.
>>
>> Algol 68 had a void value, called 'empty' in the defining report, but
>> it didn't need a name in the language itself, because there were too
>> many easy ways of geerating it.
>>
>> I always considered void to be a type with exactly one value, which
>> would need log2(1) bits to reprresent it, i.e., zero.
>>
>> The report also left a number of things undefined. An early draft of
>> the report went on to specify 'undefined' as meaning anything from a
>> reasonable continuation of the computation to 'indescribable chaos'.
>>
>> -- hendrik
>> ____________________
>> Racket Users list:
>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>>
>
>
--
Jay McCarthy
http://jeapostrophe.github.io
"Wherefore, be not weary in well-doing,
for ye are laying the foundation of a great work.
And out of small things proceedeth that which is great."
- D&C 64:33
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20150106/c5acdce2/attachment.html>