[racket] Void expression found

From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Mon Jan 5 18:51:26 EST 2015

MacArthur said so in '41. 


On Jan 5, 2015, at 6:39 PM, Robby Findler <robby at eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:

> Oh, it's there. It's just lurking, hiding, biding its time.
> 
> All bee bak.
> 
> Robby
> 
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Matthias Felleisen <matthias at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>> 
>> There is no Undefined. We got rid of it ;-)
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 5, 2015, at 6:02 PM, Robby Findler <robby at eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
>> 
>>> And yet, they are both in our current universe.
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Sean Kanaley <skanaley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I see "void" as a tangible value specifying no information, whereas
>>>> "undefined" is literally no information. So void is more like an empty
>>>> universe and undefined is no universe at all.
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Vincent St-Amour <stamourv at ccs.neu.edu>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> At Mon, 5 Jan 2015 23:20:54 +0100,
>>>>> Jos Koot wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Off topic:
>>>>>> For me the unanswered question remains:
>>>>>> Does the vacuum exist or does it not exist?
>>>>>> I don't know.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Parmenides had something to say on the matter:
>>>>>   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parmenides#The_Way_of_Truth
>>>>> 
>>>>> Vincent
>>>>> ____________________
>>>>> Racket Users list:
>>>>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ____________________
>>>> Racket Users list:
>>>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>>>> 
>>> ____________________
>>> Racket Users list:
>>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>> 



Posted on the users mailing list.