From: Hendrik Boom (hendrik at topoi.pooq.com) Date: Sat Feb 21 16:10:43 EST 2015 |
|
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 12:19:03PM -0600, Darren Cruse wrote: > > But in the end I didn't find any perfect answer either. > > I came away wishing that somehow Gambit/Lambdanative could be enhanced to > be Racket compatible... if only I had a magic wand. :) A viable common subset would be nice. How different are the standards these implementations are approximations to? -- hendrik
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|