[racket] Strange macro behavior with set! and syntax-local-introduce
I'm not sure how gensym fixes this:
#lang racket
(require (for-syntax syntax/parse racket/syntax racket/format))
(define-for-syntax funny #f)
(define-syntax (make-funny-set! stx)
(syntax-parse stx
[(_ v) #`(define #,(begin (set! funny (datum->syntax #f (gensym)))
funny) v)]))
(define-syntax (funny-ref stx)
(syntax-parse stx
[(_) funny]))
(define-syntax (funny-set! stx)
(syntax-parse stx
[(_ v) #`(set! #,funny v)]))
(make-funny-set! 2)
(void (void (void (funny-set! 3))))
(funny-ref)
errors with:
g27591: unbound identifier;
also, no #%top syntax transformer is bound in: g27591
regardless of how many calls to void there are (inclusive of 0). This makes
sense, as the syntax marks don't add up. The calls to
"syntax-local-introduce" in the original program aught to solve this, but
as we saw... `/me points to robby's email`
And removing the datum->syntax errors with:
funny-ref: received value from syntax expander was not syntax
received: 'g27876
Which also makes sense: a symbol is not Syntax.
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Robby Findler
<robby at eecs.northwestern.edu>wrote:
> How does this help us understand the original, strange program?
>
> Robby
>
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Matthias Felleisen
> <matthias at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
> >
> > Then use gensym instead of g and "~a" instead.
> >
> >
> >
> > On May 15, 2014, at 5:38 PM, Matthias Felleisen <matthias at ccs.neu.edu>
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Did you want this:
> >>
> >> #lang racket
> >>
> >> (require (for-syntax syntax/parse racket/syntax))
> >>
> >> (define-for-syntax funny #f)
> >>
> >> (define-syntax (make-funny-set! stx)
> >> (syntax-parse stx
> >> [(_ v) #`(define #,(begin (set! funny (format-id stx "g")) funny)
> v)]))
> >>
> >> (define-syntax (funny-ref stx)
> >> (syntax-parse stx
> >> [(_) funny]))
> >>
> >> (define-syntax (funny-set! stx)
> >> (syntax-parse stx
> >> [(_ v) #`(set! #,funny v)]))
> >>
> >> (make-funny-set! 2)
> >> (void (void (void (funny-set! 3))))
> >> (funny-ref)
> >>
> >> [I had to write such a macro a while back, and the above is roughly
> what I remember doing. Note the lexical context]
> >>
> >>
> >> On May 15, 2014, at 5:25 PM, Spencer Florence <spencer at florence.io>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'm attempting to write a macro which introduces a new id, then
> another macro that set!s that id.
> >>> Example:
> >>>
> >>> #lang racket
> >>> (require (for-syntax syntax/parse racket/syntax))
> >>> (define-for-syntax funny #f)
> >>> (define-syntax (make-funny-set! stx)
> >>> (syntax-parse stx
> >>> [(_ v)
> >>> (define unmarked (generate-temporary))
> >>> (set! funny (syntax-local-introduce unmarked))
> >>> #`(define #,unmarked v)]))
> >>> (define-syntax (funny-ref stx)
> >>> (syntax-parse stx
> >>> [(_)
> >>> funny]))
> >>> (define-syntax (funny-set! stx)
> >>> (syntax-parse stx
> >>> [(_ v)
> >>> #`(set! #,(syntax-local-introduce funny) v)]))
> >>>
> >>> (make-funny-set! 2)
> >>> (funny-set! 3)
> >>> (funny-ref)
> >>>
> >>> This program works as I expect, evaluating to 3. However if I change
> (funny-set! 3) to (void (funny-set! 3)) I get the error: "set!: unbound
> identifier in module in: g1"
> >>>
> >>> I do not get this error if I change (funny-ref) to (void (funny-ref)).
> >>>
> >>> If I look at the expansion of the (void (funny-set! 3)) program in
> drracket's macro stepper the the g1 in (define g1 2) and the g1 in (void
> (set! g1 3)) have the same color.
> >>>
> >>> To keep on with the strange, if I change the #,(syntax-local-introduce
> funny) inside of funny-set! to #,funny inside the behavior of all programs
> remains the same.
> >>>
> >>> Could someone explain whats going on?
> >>>
> >>> --Spencer
> >>> ____________________
> >>> Racket Users list:
> >>> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
> >>
> >>
> >> ____________________
> >> Racket Users list:
> >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
> >
> >
> > ____________________
> > Racket Users list:
> > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20140515/44b0782a/attachment.html>