From: Greg Hendershott (greghendershott at gmail.com) Date: Mon May 5 11:53:09 EDT 2014 |
|
Would it make sense for will executors [^1] to have a definition of "unreachability" that includes GC, as now, but also immanent program termination (and they run automatically on termination)? Will executors have a per-"object" granularity. That seems like how you'd usually prefer to express it -- and best for organizing and maintaining code, and using third-party modules that cooperate smoothly? [^1]: http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/willexecutor.html
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|