| From: Jens Axel Søgaard (jensaxel at soegaard.net) Date: Sun Jun 29 06:44:10 EDT 2014 |
|
2014-06-29 8:47 GMT+02:00 Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu>: > It looks like "partitions2.rkt" ends up calling a contract-wrapped > variant of `exact-zero?`. That explains why Eric saw an improvement, when the used #f instead of 0 as the not-cached-yet value. /Jens Axel
| Posted on the users mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}