[racket] FW: q about code for partitions

From: Jens Axel Søgaard (jensaxel at soegaard.net)
Date: Sun Jun 29 06:44:10 EDT 2014

2014-06-29 8:47 GMT+02:00 Matthew Flatt <mflatt at cs.utah.edu>:
> It looks like "partitions2.rkt" ends up calling a contract-wrapped
> variant of `exact-zero?`.

That explains why Eric saw an improvement, when the used #f instead of
0 as the not-cached-yet value.

/Jens Axel

Posted on the users mailing list.