From: Matthew Flatt (mflatt at cs.utah.edu) Date: Sun Jun 22 02:58:52 EDT 2014 |
|
I'm pretty sure that the docs are right in this case. At Sat, 21 Jun 2014 22:26:06 -0400, "Alexander D. Knauth" wrote: > The docs say that (syntax-local-phase-level) returns an exact-integer?, but the > type is (-> (U Integer False)). > > Are the docs right, or is the type right? > > Would a syntax-transformer ever be expanded as a label phase level form? > > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|