From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu) Date: Sat Jun 14 15:04:47 EDT 2014 |
|
No, TR expands first, then checks. -- Matthias On Jun 14, 2014, at 2:59 PM, Spencer Florence wrote: > Hey All, > > I'm trying to take advantage of typed/racket in a few macros. Is there any way to check the type of an expression from its syntax object? something like: > > (:has-type? (-> Void) #'expression) > > > --Spencer > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|